Home Product Directory Topics Note Pad electronica 2008 EuMW 2008 Back Issues RF Blogs Military Electronics Subscribe News Online News Design Features Web Seminars PartFinder Whitepapers Microwave Legends Newsletter WebConnect RF Design  RSS


PART SEARCH :
GlobalSpec - The Engineering Search Engine


Related Resources

  
Reprints   Printer-Friendly    Email this Article    RSS        Font Size     What's This?

[Systems & Subsystems]
Design Improves 4.3-GHz Radio Altimeter Accuracy
This radio altimeter employs a dual-channel (quadrature) homodyne receiver to achieve improved accuracy in the standard 4.3-GHz allocated band for small aircraft and UAVs.

Matjaz Vidmar  |  ED Online ID #10583 |  June 2005

Short-range radio altimeters are important safety and navigational tools in small aircraft. Usually designed as short-range frequency-modulated (FM) radars in the 4.2-to-4.4-GHz band,1 their main applications are for instrument-based approaches and landings for larger commercial aircraft, although they are also suitable for smaller aircraft and even unmanned air vehicles (UAVs). The accuracy and resolution of aviation altimeters is usually limited to a few feet due to the limited availability of bandwidth (200 MHz) in the 4.3-GHz range. Fortunately, by adding a second receiver channel in quadrature, it may be possible to dramatically improve the resolution and accuracy of these short-range radio altimeters.

The basic operation of a radio altimeter is shown in Fig. 1. It is a low-power, continuous-wave (CW) radar system that generally requires separate transmit and receiver antennas. The radio-wave propagation delay is usually too short to switch a single antenna between the transmitter and the receiver. Most attempts were directed toward improving the radio-altimeter reliability involving parallel operation of two or three instruments on the same aircraft. Most aviation radio altimeters have separate transmit and receive antennas although considerable efforts were invested into developing a single-antenna radio altimeter.2

For correct operation, the receiving antenna should detect only the reflected signal from the runway and not the radio signal coming directly from the transmitting antenna. The two antennas must be widely separate to avoid crosstalk. Although electronic filtering of the crosstalk allows the design of single-antenna radio altimeters, the operation of the latter is usually limited above a specified minimum altitude.

Most aviation radio altimeters are frequency-modulated (FM) CW radars. The carrier frequency of the transmitter is swept continuously in a given frequency range. Since the received signal is delayed, the receive frequency differs from the transmitter. If the rate-of-change of the transmitter frequency is constant, the delay and therefore altitude are directly proportional to the measured frequency difference between the transmitter and receiver.

Figure 2 shows the design of a conventional FM radio altimeter. The sweep waveform is triangular and both slopes are typically used for the altitude measurement to compensate for the Doppler shift due to the vertical speed of the aircraft. The sweep frequency is usually between 50 and 300 Hz. The higher limit is imposed by the receiver thermal noise, the lower limit is the ability of the radio altimeter to eliminate the Doppler shift in the case of a descending or climbing aircraft.

Most aviation radio altimeters operate in the 4.2-to-4.4-GHz frequency band. Of the 200 MHz available, only about 150 MHz in midband is typically used. The 4.3-GHz (7-cm-wavelength) frequency band is a compromise between the bandwidth available (accuracy of the measurement) and the surface roughness of the runway or other reflecting target. Transmitter power ranges from 10 mW (+10 dBm) to 500 mW (+27 dBm). The directivity of both transmit and receive antennas is limited to about 10 dBi to allow the operation of the radio altimeter at moderate pitch and bank angles of the aircraft.

The receiver is a homodyne design using a mixer to derive the difference between the transmit and receive frequencies. The beat frequency is usually less than 1 MHz. Part of the transmitter signal is also used as the local oscillator (LO) for the receiver. Some radio-altimeter designs may simply use the crosstalk between the transmit and receive antennas to feed the LO signal in the receive mixer.

The beat signal is filtered first, then amplified and limited. A frequency counter drives the altitude indicator and various altitude alarms if required. Of course, transmission delays (due mainly to the cables connecting the antennas to the electronics of the radio altimeter) must be subtracted from the measured altitude.

Figure 3 shows that the accuracy and resolution of a radio altimeter are limited by the RF bandwidth. For a given frequency sweep, the electronics produces a certain beat frequency with a limited number of transitions that can be counted. As the measured altitude changes, the beat pattern shifts and the counter result actually makes several oscillations between two adjacent values.

There are different ways to improve the accuracy and resolution of a radio altimeter. The simplest solution is to increase the frequency sweep up to 400 MHz as suggested in ref. 3. A better solution is to add a low-frequency (around 10-Hz) triangular dither waveform to the main triangular sweep. In this way the oscillations between two adjacent values are averaged out during several measurements, however some additional bandwidth is required for the dither.

The approach in this article is to add a second receiving channel in quadrature. In this way the number of available transitions is doubled and the accuracy and resolution are improved by a factor of 2. Further, the low-frequency dither amplitude can be halved so that less bandwidth is wasted for the dither. Finally, a quadrature design of a homodyne receiver is required anyway to extract all of the available information out of the received signal.

To demonstrate the author's approach, an accurate radio altimeter with a dual-channel (quadrature) homodyne receiver was developed and built (Fig. 4). The main application of this radio altimeter is to aid in small aircraft landings. The transmitter modulator includes two triangular oscillators: the main sweep at 150 Hz and the dither at 15 Hz. The dither amplitude is set to about 10 percent of the main sweep amplitude. The sum of both waveforms is applied to the microwave voltage-controlled oscillator (VCO) operating directly at 4.3 GHz. The VCO includes a BFP420 transistor amplifier from Infineon Technologies (San Jose, CA) and an interdigital filter in the feedback. Due to the relatively narrow sweep, only the central microstrip resonator is tuned with a single BBY51 varactor diode from Infineon.4

The VCO is followed by two amplifier-buffer stages using another BFP420 bipolar transistor and a MGF4918 high-electron-mobility transistor (HEMT) from Mitsubishi Electronics America (Sunnyvale, CA). The latter produces RF power of about 40 mW (+16 dBm) at 4.3 GHz. Most of this signal is fed to the transmit antenna, while a small fraction (about 1 mW or 0 dBm) is coupled and sent through a lowpass filter to provide the homodyne LO.

The receiver RF front end includes a single-stage low-noise amplifier (LNA) with another MGF4918 HEMT and two IAM81008 balanced mixers from Agilent Technologies (Santa Clara, CA) in quadrature. The RF and LO signals are split with two Wilkinson hybrids. Different-length microstrip lines are used to obtain the required phase shifts. The IAM81008 mixers (formerly from Avantek and now obsolete) are used beyond their designed frequency range in this application, therefore the overall noise figure of the receiver is in the 15-to-20-dB range.

The RF section of the radio altimeter is built on two (transmitter and receiver) printed-circuit boards (PCBs) fabricated in microstrip technology (Fig. 5). Each PCB is 80 mm long and 20 mm wide. Both boards are etched on 19-mil-thick Ultralam 2000 teflon laminate from Rogers Corp. (Rogers, CT) with a dielectric constant of 2.43. Figure 6 shows the top side of both boards; the bottom side is not etched to act as the microstrip groundplane. Both boards are soldered in a frame made of thin brass sheet for shielding purposes.

Both in-phase (I) and quadrature (Q) beat signals are filtered and amplified. The dual-channel amplifier has a common automatic-gain-control (AGC) circuit. The AGC time constant must be carefully chosen to minimize the effects of signal dropouts due to poor reflections. Noise is removed by two Schmitt-trigger stages driving a pulse-former circuit that produces one output pulse for every zero crossing of any of the two input signals.

The pulses are fed to a frequency counter implemented inside a 8-b PIC16F84A microcontroller from Microchip Technology (Chandler, AZ). The gate of the counter is not synchronized to the main sweep nor to the triangular dither. The microprocessor however performs digital averaging (filtering) of the measured result. Due to the relatively low frequencies involved, a clock frequency of only 4 MHz is more than sufficient for the PIC16F84.


<-- prev. page     [1] 2     next page -->




Reprints   Printer-Friendly    Email this Article    RSS        Font Size     What's This?




Reader Comments

very good engineers you are

Anonymous -September 30, 2008

IT was most useful. I am ready to pay for this 10000$ . Please can u mail me this article

Gautam -April 30, 2008

we do commercial parasailing and I am looking for an inexpensive altimeter system that I can attach to the parasail harness and get a remote altimeter reading at the boat helm--can anyone help me on where I can find this item. tks doug 253-272-3883---or is there anyone out there that build me one.

doug -April 26, 2008

My communication project is about Radio Altimeters so where can I find this circuit schematics.

aviator -March 22, 2008

Can I oder one for my students?

Tain-Sou Tsay -January 31, 2008   (Article Rating: )

Very interesting project! I'll try to buil and to test a prototype , is it possible to have some informations about electrical schematics or partlist of it?

ULM & Tecnician Pilot -July 19, 2007   (Article Rating: )

fmcw radar

ali -May 22, 2007   (Article Rating: )

Very interesting project! Should be commercialized! A follow-on article to discuss phase noise and it's decorrelating effects between TX and RX would be an excellent topic.

Charlie -April 19, 2007   (Article Rating: )

One of the best articles that gives the basic concept of the system with illustrations.We expect more of such explanations from the author on other difficult topics.We appriciate the author's good effort on the subject Radio Altimeters.

siva -January 29, 2007   (Article Rating: )

Useful stuff Matjaz. Keep up, and ignore the ubiquitous bs. 73.

Frank -September 26, 2006   (Article Rating: )

IT IS A VERY FINE AND BRALINT WRITE UP.BUT I NEED A WRITEUP ON F M WIRELESS MICROPHONE IF POSSIBLE THANK YOU.

AIRIEDE MARTINS -September 19, 2006

I m an engg. student 4m extc branch. ur article on radio altimeters is so good , as the same i was searching 4m many days.

gautam s wanjari -September 03, 2005

may useful to you

shijiu wang -July 01, 2005   (Article Rating: )

I have over 16 years experience with single antenna FM/CW radars developed for applications as missile seekers and radar altimeters. The author and the referenced Mr. Maloratsky are both unaware of the principal causes of poor sensitivity and the need for dual antenna systems in typical FM/CW radars. Both Mr. Maloratsky's and the authors system describe open loop modulation schemes that produce non-linear FM and that are subject to the very high phase noise of low Q VCO's used to provide tuning. Lastly, typical single antenna systems also must use antennas that provide excellent VSWR performance across the usable band - typically <1.25:1 or better to help limit self jam.

THe use of an LNA on the receiver is intended to reduce the noise figure but it effectively reduces the isolatiion between transmit and receive antennas by the amount of gain it provides. An LNA is not permitted in a single antenna FM/CW condfiguration because the gain will raise the power level of leakage from the circulator to the receiver mixer - causing the level to match or exceed the desired LO drive level.

Open Loop VCO's are subject to load VSWR pulling during the modulation period in addition to the non-linear voltage Vs frequency characteristic of typical varactor controls. Non-linearity in the modulation leads directly to decorrelation between the transmitted and delayed received signals. The decorrelation is worse with higher altitudes or longer ranges - resulting in loss of sensitivity due to spectral spreading of the IF signal.

Dual antenna installations also suffer from two sources of loss of sensitivity - 1) Loss of signal close to the ground due to lack of overlap in antenna patterns between transmit and receive antennas. The required bounce between transmit and receive antennas becomes increasingly more difficult to achieve with shorter ranges as the angle of incidence and antenna beam width (now in the very near field of the antenna) become nearly zero. ARINC standard performance specifications show rapid loss of sensitivity near the ground that is a function of antenna spacing and beamwidth.

2) Roll angle of the aicraft. The author shows the antennas as being placed beside one another in his drawing - separated only by the width of the aircraft. Standard commercial altimeter installation is fore and aft on the fuselage - specifically to provide the longest possible separation between the antennas to provide isolation for high phase noise systems and to insure that the two antennas remain focused at a fixed altitude as the aircraft rolls during landing. Placing the antennas on the fuselage off the centerline causes the antennas to be squinted outboard by the curvature of the fuslage - or requires fairing blocks to keep the antennas co-focused. Typically commercial aircraft antenna installations separate the antennas by at least 4 feet and more if feasible. Typically a small aircraft would not possibly provide that kind of sideways spacing and would need to orient the antennas fore and aft. However - reflections from fixed landing gear can cause other problems in the installation.

My teams built single antenna FM/CW radars that achieved 1.5 ft range resolution at 2 Km range, with the ability to detect a 1 Sqaure meter target with a 10 dB SNR using 100mW transmit power at 35GHz in the 1990's. We did so using very clever phase lock loop frequency synthesis techniques that reduced phase noise of the source VCO by as much as 40 dB and that provided nearly ideal linear FM with linearity errors less than 0.02%.

Production variation in absolute frequency, temperature drift rates, phase noise and modulation linearity of open loop VCO's causes serious problems for production applicatioins of this technology. Honeywell is about to introduce a state of the art digitally synthesized FM/CW radar altimeter for commercial applications. I have filed several patents regarding its design and performance characteristics and when legally possible would very much like the opportunity to write a descriptive article about this technol0gy.

A single antenna version of a radar altimeter is possible without the complications of Maloratsky's patent that provides virtually optimal performance with excellent manufacturability and stability as it is referenced to a TCXO - that is also the source of the exceptionally low phase noise of the system.

David Vacanti Sr. Principal Engineer COMMNAV (Radar Altimetery / GPS Nav) Honeywell Intl.

David Vacanti -June 26, 2005   (Article Rating: )

Informative.

Dr. Heinrich Atomic -June 21, 2005

POST YOUR COMMENTS HERE
Name:

Email:
Rate this article:

 less useful more useful 
1
2
3
4
5

Your Comments: