Tweet [Feedback] Feedback Various Readers | ED Online ID #21655 | August 2009 Dear Editor, However, I do have a general problem with the growing trend in this industry on total reliance on EM simulators and other computer-aided-engineering (CAE) design tools. It is not that such software tools are not accurate or reliable; for the most part, they deliver as advertised. The problem I have is one of fundamental education: that using such tools does not teach a new RF/microwave engineer the basics of applying Maxwell’s equations to solving EM field problems, or even how to use differential and integral equations to work out the current flow through conductive transmission lines. My fear is that in using such “prepackaged” software tools, younger engineers will lose the “feel” for solving design problems with “pencil and paper” in the way that we older engineers were taught. By solving basic design problems without the help of software and a computer, an engineer truly learns the mechanisms behind current flow through a conductor, about the isolation afforded by different insulator materials, and even about the effects of changes in laminate dielectric constant on the operating frequency of a design. Yes, the software makes the job easier,
for now. But is it helping to produce
tomorrow’s innovative, free-thinking
engineers, or just a bunch of mousepushing
menu-driven technicians? In
any case, keep up the good work with
the magazine. Editor’s Note:
| ||||||||||||||||||||||














